Nvidia Rtx A6000 Vs Rtx 3090
Price at present 1455$ Games supported 100% Price now 13494$ Games supported 100% Comparison of graphics card compages, market segment, value for money and other general parameters. Value for coin To get the index we compare the characteristics of video cards and their relative prices. General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing procedure, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, simply for precise assessment you take to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Annotation that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked. Information on compatibility with other figurer components. Useful when choosing a futurity computer configuration or upgrading an existing i. For desktop video cards information technology'south interface and motorbus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (ability supply compatibility). Parameters of memory installed: its blazon, size, jitney, clock and resulting bandwidth. Notation that GPUs integrated into processors have no dedicated VRAM and utilize a shared part of organization RAM. Types and number of video connectors nowadays on the reviewed GPUs. As a dominion, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-chosen Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself. APIs supported, including particular versions of those APIs. Non-gaming criterion performance comparison. Notation that overall benchmark performance is measured in points in 0-100 range. This is our combined benchmark operation rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, just if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments department, we normally fix bug chop-chop. 3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. Information technology taxes the graphics menu with two scenes, 1 depicting a girl escaping some militarized base of operations located within a body of water cavern, the other displaying a space armada attack on a defenseless planet. Information technology was discontinued in April 2017, and Fourth dimension Spy criterion is now recommended to exist used instead. Benchmark coverage: 17% 3DMark eleven is an obsolete DirectX xi benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken transport, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is at present superseded by Time Spy. Benchmark coverage: 17% Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level ten benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Only like Ice Tempest benchmark, information technology has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid. Benchmark coverage: 14% Burn down Strike is a DirectX xi benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery animate being seemingly made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic plenty graphics and is quite taxing on hardware. Benchmark coverage: 14% Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, role of 3DMark suite. Water ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets operation. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to brandish a boxing between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, information technology is now superseded past 3DMark Night Raid. Benchmark coverage: 8% Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS. Hither are the average frames per second in a big ready of popular games across different resolutions: +91.7% −91.7% +56.ix% −56.ix% +139% −139% +146% −146% +52.8% −52.8% +212% −212% +84.eight% −84.8% +143% −143% +176% −176% +165% −165% +139% −139% +138% −138% +79.2% −79.two% +68.1% −68.one% +xl.three% −40.iii% +119% −119% +135% −135% +48.6% −48.6% +189% −189% +72.1% −72.1% +143% −143% +172% −172% +132% −132% +48% −48% +83.3% −83.iii% +114% −114% +two.6% −two.half-dozen% +61.i% −61.i% +27.viii% −27.viii% +25% −25% +103% −103% +47.ii% −47.2% +171% −171% +63.1% −63.1% +131% −131% −8.4% +eight.4% +45.8% −45.8% +107% −107% +147% −147% +95.8% −95.viii% +26.2% −26.2% +27.8% −27.8% +121% −121% +13.9% −13.nine% +8.3% −8.3% +80.6% −lxxx.6% +19.iv% −nineteen.4% +163% −163% +66.7% −66.vii% +128% −128% +23.6% −23.6% +33.3% −33.iii% +65.3% −65.iii% +23.half dozen% −23.six% +2.nine% −two.9% −12.5% +12.5% +30.six% −30.6% −5.eight% +five.8% −10.viii% +10.viii% −28.6% +28.6% +56.9% −56.9% −56.5% +56.5% +110% −110% +52.four% −52.4% +104% −104% −22% +22% Judging past the results of synthetic and gaming tests, Technical Metropolis recommends NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 since it shows ameliorate operation. Exist aware that GeForce RTX 3090 is a desktop bill of fare while Quadro RTX A6000 is a workstation one. Should you all the same accept questions apropos selection betwixt the reviewed GPUs, inquire them in Comments section, and we shall respond. Exercise yous call back nosotros are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" push button near your favorite graphics menu. Nosotros believe that the nearest equivalent to GeForce RTX 3090 from AMD is Radeon RX 6900 XT, which is slower by 3% and lower by 1 position in our rating. Here are some closest AMD rivals to GeForce RTX 3090: We believe that the nearest equivalent to Quadro RTX A6000 from AMD is Radeon Pro W6800, which is slower by 9% and lower by 11 positions in our rating. Hither are some closest AMD rivals to Quadro RTX A6000: We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance more or less close to those reviewed, providing you lot with more options to consider. Here yous can see the user rating of the graphics cards, also as rate them yourself. Rate NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 on a scale of one to v: Rate NVIDIA Quadro RTX A6000 on a scale of 1 to 5: Hither you tin enquire a question about this comparing, concord or disagree with our judgements, or study an error or mismatch. Graphics settings Screen resolution FPSGeForce RTX 3090 vs Quadro RTX A6000
General info
Place in performance rating 5 16 Value for money 18.55 no data Architecture Ampere (2020−2022) Ampere (2020−2022) GPU lawmaking name Ampere GA102 Ampere Market segment Desktop Workstation Release date 24 September 2020 (1 year ago) 5 Oct 2020 (ane twelvemonth ago) Launch toll (MSRP) $1,499 $4,649 Current price $1455 (1x MSRP) $13494 (2.9x MSRP) Technical specs
Pipelines / CUDA cores 10496 10752 Cadre clock speed 1400 MHz 1410 MHz Boost clock speed 1700 MHz 1800 MHz Number of transistors 28,300 million 28,300 1000000 Manufacturing process applied science 8 nm 8 nm Thermal design power (TDP) 350 Watt 300 Watt Texture fill rate 556.0 625.0 Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface PCIe four.0 x16 PCIe 4.0 x16 Length 313 mm 267 mm Width iii-slot 2-slot Supplementary ability connectors 1x 12-pivot 8-pivot EPS Memory
Memory type GDDR6X GDDR6 Maximum RAM amount 24 GB 48 GB Memory coach width 384 Bit 384 Bit Memory clock speed 19500 MHz 16000 MHz Memory bandwidth 936.2 GB/s 768.0 GB/s Shared retentiveness - - Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort 4x DisplayPort HDMI + no data API support
DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) 12 Ultimate (12_2) Shader Model 6.5 6.v OpenGL four.6 iv.6 OpenCL ii.0 2.0 Vulkan 1.2 one.two CUDA 8.5 8.half dozen Benchmark operation
Overall score
Gaming functioning
Full HD 175 160 1440p 135 129 4K 98 104
Low Preset
Medium Preset
High Preset
Ultra Preset
Loftier Preset
Ultra Preset
High Preset
Ultra Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey 138 70−75 Assassin'southward Creed Valhalla 113 70−75 Battleground 5 172 seventy−75 Phone call of Duty: Modern Warfare 177 70−75 Cyberpunk 2077 110 70−75 Far Cry 5 162 52 Far Cry New Dawn 122 66 Forza Horizon iv 175 70−75 Hitman three 199 lxx−75 Horizon Zero Dawn 191 70−75 Red Expressionless Redemption ii 172 70−75 Shadow of the Tomb Raider 171 70−75 Watch Dogs: Legion 129 70−75
Assassin's Creed Odyssey 121 70−75 Assassin'south Creed Valhalla 101 seventy−75 Battlefield 5 158 70−75 Call of Duty: Mod Warfare 169 70−75 Cyberpunk 2077 107 70−75 Far Cry five 153 53 Far Cry New Dawn 117 68 Forza Horizon 4 175 70−75 Hitman iii 196 70−75 Horizon Zippo Dawn 167 lxx−75 Metro Exodus 145 98 Ruby-red Dead Redemption two 132 70−75 Shadow of the Tomb Raider 154 lxx−75 The Witcher iii: Wild Hunt 315 307 Lookout Dogs: Legion 116 70−75
Assassin's Creed Odyssey 92 70−75 Assassin's Creed Valhalla 90 70−75 Battlefield 5 146 70−75 Cyberpunk 2077 106 70−75 Far Cry 5 141 52 Far Cry New Dawn 106 65 Forza Horizon 4 166 lxx−75 The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 166 180 Scout Dogs: Legion 105 70−75
Phone call of Duty: Modernistic Warfare 149 70−75 Hitman iii 178 seventy−75 Horizon Zippo Dawn 141 70−75 Metro Exodus 106 84 Ruddy Dead Redemption ii 92 70−75 Shadow of the Tomb Raider 159 70−75
Assassin'south Creed Odyssey 82 70−75 Assassinator'due south Creed Valhalla 78 70−75 Battlefield 5 130 70−75 Cyberpunk 2077 86 lxx−75 Far Weep 5 137 52 Far Cry New Dawn 105 63 Forza Horizon 4 164 70−75 Watch Dogs: Legion 89 70−75
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 96 70−75 Hitman 3 119 70−75 Horizon Zero Dawn 89 70−75 Metro Exodus 72 seventy Red Dead Redemption 2 64 70−75 Shadow of the Tomb Raider 94 lxx−75 The Witcher three: Wild Hunt 138 146
Assassinator's Creed Odyssey 65 70−75 Assassin's Creed Valhalla 56 lxx−75 Battlefield 5 113 lxx−75 Cyberpunk 2077 46 70−75 Far Cry 5 105 50 Far Cry New Dawn 96 63 Forza Horizon 4 147 lxx−75 Picket Dogs: Legion 59 70−75 Advantages and disadvantages
Functioning rating 90.05 72.04 Cost $1499 $4649 Memory bandwidth 936.two 768 Pipelines / CUDA cores 10496 10752 Thermal design power (TDP) 350 Watt 300 Watt
Cast your vote
Competitors of GeForce RTX 3090 by AMD
Competitors of Quadro RTX A6000 by AMD
Similar GPU comparisons
User rating
Questions and comments
Source: https://technical.city/en/video/GeForce-RTX-3090-vs-Quadro-RTX-A6000
0 Response to "Nvidia Rtx A6000 Vs Rtx 3090"
Post a Comment